To get a clinical social worker license in Washington state, you must complete a master's degree, log thousands of hours of supervised practice, and pass a four-hour national exam on ethics and professional scenarios. Critics insist that this exam has become the main barrier to diversifying the profession — especially for candidates of color. According to national statistics, about 85% of white candidates pass the exam on their first try, while only 45% of Black candidates do. Against a backdrop of licensing delays, staffing shortages and rising demand for mental health care, students and practitioners are increasingly asking whether the exam should remain the primary gateway into the field.
The situation is worsened by a large-scale adolescent mental health crisis. Washington State Department of Health data show that from 2019 to 2023 the number of teens seeking crisis psychiatric services rose by 40%. Diagnoses of depression and anxiety among high school students increased by 50%, and the suicide rate for 15–19-year-olds reached its highest level in a decade. At the same time, the state lacks 1,500 child psychiatrists and social workers. Needs for specialists vary widely by region. Seattle, as a major city, faces high demand for workers able to help people experiencing homelessness, those with substance use disorders and at-risk youth. Eastern parts of the state, including Spokane and Yakima, urgently need providers for rural communities where access is hampered by low population density. Internal migration of professionals is limited: few move from expensive Seattle to the east because of differences in wages and quality of life, although the east offers a lower cost of living.
Students at Eastern Washington University (EWU) launched a campaign to eliminate the mandatory uniform exam. Their proposal is an alternative licensing pathway based on extended supervised practice instead of a single high-stakes test. A similar bill was considered in the last legislative session but did not pass. Activists believe such a reform would better reflect the realities of social work and attract people from diverse racial, cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds. The student movement grew out of a policy-change course and spilled beyond the classroom. Their plan would waive the national exam provided candidates complete the extended practicum. “One of the ethical principles of social work is social justice,” explains master's student Libby Holland. “We are obligated to challenge systems and injustices — that’s exactly what we’re doing.” They are appealing to lawmakers and collecting signatures to promote their idea.
Opponents of the current model point out that the exam and the entire licensing system are rooted in a White, Western worldview that marginalizes other approaches. Financial barriers — exam fees, costs for study materials — hit students from low-income families particularly hard. Seattle’s high cost of living makes completing thousands of hours of supervised practice nearly impossible. The average rent for a one-bedroom apartment in the city is $2,000–$2,500 per month, and a transit pass costs $100–$150. Interns are typically unpaid or earn a minimum wage of $16–$18 an hour, forcing many to take a second job. That leads to burnout and attrition: 40–50% of beginning social workers drop out of practicum due to financial pressure, and 3,000 hours stretch over 2–3 years instead of one.
EWU faculty advisor Latisha Williams, who is herself preparing for licensure, asserts the test is oriented toward clinical settings such as hospitals and reflects White norms. “You can’t come in with only your cultural knowledge and expect to succeed — you have to put on a Western, White, European lens,” she explained. Students give examples where cultural experience suggests a different response and the exam accepts only one “right” answer. For instance, a question about calling the police in a crisis: someone from a community that views police with suspicion might hesitate, whereas for a person from another context that action seems obvious. “A different answer doesn’t make you a bad social worker,” says EWU master’s student Scott Steinhaus, “but the test can penalize you for it and narrows your view of how to address cultural issues in your community.”
The Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB), which develops and administers the exam, acknowledges racial gaps in pass rates but does not agree to abandon the test. Executive Director Dr. Stacy Hardy-Chandler notes ASWB has studied disparities and found some schools have almost no racial gap — thanks to better student preparation. “I would like social work to be without inequity, but it does not exist in a vacuum,” she says. In her view, “the exam is not the target,” it merely exposes problems in the education system. Hardy-Chandler insists education, supervised practice and the uniform exam are all necessary for professional standards. Supervision, while important, cannot substitute for a standardized assessment of knowledge and ethics. “The quality of that stage depends on who your supervisor is — hours don’t guarantee quality,” she warns. Removing the uniform exam, she says, would complicate interstate licensure reciprocity.
Interstate practice is becoming a priority amid the workforce shortage. Thirty-two states have approved the “social compact,” allowing practice in any participating state after passing the national exam. If Washington ratifies it, Seattle practitioners could legally work in Portland, Oregon and other compact states without retaking the exam. However, Vancouver (British Columbia, Canada) is not part of that compact because it’s a different country: working there requires a separate Canadian license. Meanwhile several states — Illinois, Colorado, Maine — have passed laws eliminating the exam for certain licenses. Hardy-Chandler says it’s premature to judge the consequences but expresses concern for clients who may not know whether their provider took the test.
State Representative Alicia Rula of Whatcom County introduced a bill to eliminate the exam, but the measure did not pass. Rula, a longtime social worker, believes written tests are not always the best way to assess competency. “Both pathways should be valid — through supervision or through the exam,” she says. “That will open the profession to different people, and we see that as a plus.”
The EWU students’ alternative pathway proposes doubling super
Based on: To boost social worker diversity, should WA reconsider its exam?