The first round of political consultations between the United States and Iran in Switzerland has concluded, and the two sides are now focusing on the technical work needed to iron out the details. Qatar and Pakistan served as mediators. An agreement has been reached to form several working groups to address key issues—ranging from the nuclear program to sanctions and dispute-resolution mechanisms. It is expected that it is the technical teams who, in the coming days, will lay the groundwork for a final agreement.
At the technical level, the sides are set to discuss specific steps for implementing the memorandum of understanding signed earlier. The focus is on resuming the export of Iranian oil, removing the related restrictions, and unblocking frozen Iranian assets. Tehran insists on the principle of “commitment for commitment”: any easing on one side must be immediately matched by a reciprocal step from the other. Iran also stressed that the agenda of the talks can be expanded only after the basic points of the memorandum are fulfilled.
The negotiating process nearly collapsed amid sharp remarks by US President Donald Trump about Iran. The Iranian delegation lodged a protest, and contacts were temporarily suspended. However, through the efforts of Doha and Islamabad, communication was restored.
The US delegation included Vice President JD Vance, special envoy Steve Witkoff, and Jared Kushner. Iran was represented by Majlis speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Following the meeting, a high-level political commission was established, and a 60-day roadmap was approved to move toward a full agreement.
In addition to economic and nuclear issues, the sides agreed on a range of measures to reduce tensions in the region. A permanent line of communication has been set up for matters related to the Strait of Hormuz—this will help avoid accidental incidents that could disrupt international shipping. In the Lebanon track, it was announced that a joint cell would be formed to monitor compliance with the ceasefire regime. This mechanism is viewed as a first test of the new understandings between Washington and Tehran.
US Vice President Vance said that the technical talks would run for the entire week, and that the last round laid “a good foundation for a final agreement.” He said that mechanisms to prevent military escalation were developed and that free passage through the Strait of Hormuz would be preserved. Vance also said that Iran agreed to invite international inspectors—talks with the IAEA will begin in Burgstein (Bürgenstock). In addition, Washington announced the launch of a demining operation in the strait.
Vance also addressed the Lebanon track separately: the United States supports Israel’s right to self-defense, but within mechanisms that prevent the situation from getting out of control. He urged Iran to use its influence to restrain Hezbollah. Pakistan’s prime minister, for his part, announced the successful conclusion of the first meeting of the top commission and confirmed agreement on the 60-day roadmap. A political oversight committee has been created, and executive technical talks have started.
Comments on the news
What is the strategic significance of the Strait of Hormuz for Iran and global energy trade, and why is its security a key issue in the talks? — The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow passage between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, through which about 20–25% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas volume is transported. For Iran, the strait is both an economic lever and a vulnerability: Tehran could block it in the event of a military threat, triggering a sharp rise in energy prices. The security of the strait is a key item on the agenda because any escalation in the region (for example, a conflict involving the US or Israel) would jeopardize global energy supplies, forcing major powers to seek political compromises with Iran.
Who is “Hezbollah,” and what role does it play in relations between Iran and Lebanon, given the US request that Tehran use its influence to restrain it? — Hezbollah is a Lebanese Shia political party and a paramilitary group established in the 1980s with Iranian financial and military support. It functions as the armed wing of Iranian influence in Lebanon and the region (it participates in the Lebanese government and fought Israel). In Iran–Lebanon relations, Hezbollah is a tool of Iran’s “proxy strategy”: through it, Tehran can influence Beirut’s politics and threaten Israel. The US request to restrain Hezbollah means Washington views Iran as the only force capable of limiting the group’s actions (for example, preventing attacks on Israel), which makes Iran a key negotiating partner in the Lebanon–Israel context.
Who is Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, and what role does he play in Iran’s political system beyond being speaker of parliament? — Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf is a prominent Iranian conservative politician, former mayor of Tehran (2005–2017), and former commander of the Air Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). In addition to serving as speaker of parliament (since 2020), he is a member of the Expediency Discernment Council, an advisory body to the Supreme Leader, and one of the most influential intermediaries between the IRGC’s “hard-line” faction and the political leadership. Qalibaf often plays the role of a “system man,” capable of bridging different conservative factions, and is seen as a potential candidate to succeed the Supreme Leader or as a future presidential contender.
Full version: Swiss talks.. Washington and Tehran move into the technical phase