Syrian singer Shadi Jamil publicly apologized to the people of the country for a song in which he previously praised Bashar al-Assad. His statement came after widespread criticism of his former political views and the cancellation of a concert scheduled at the Damascus Opera House. In an audio recording circulated online, the artist said that acknowledging a mistake is a virtue.
Jamil asked forgiveness from all Syrians—from children and young people to parents, the wounded, and the families of those killed. The latest wave of outrage was sparked by an archived video of his performance in Venezuela in 2014, when he sang in support of Assad following his reelection to a third presidential term.
The release of the video reignited discussion about the singer’s position during the years of the Syrian uprising. Against this backdrop, calls intensified to cancel his concert, scheduled for July 8 at the Damascus Opera House. Syria’s Minister of Culture, Muhammad Yasin Saleh, said the event had been canceled because of Jamil’s past statements, stressing that artists who supported the former regime should not return to the opera stage without apologizing to the people.
The minister also promised to hold accountable the institution that issued permits for the concert in defiance of an order banning such performances. Jamil himself said he had not officially received an explanation for the cancellation and that the event had been approved by the artists’ union and other relevant authorities. He said he was ready to respect the authorities’ decisions, called for the past to be put behind them, and stressed that he did not intend to leave Syria, remaining closely tied to his homeland and his native Aleppo.
Comments on the News
What role did Syrian artists and state cultural institutions play in supporting Bashar al-Assad’s regime during the uprising and the subsequent war? — Some prominent artists openly supported Assad by performing at pro-government events, issuing statements, and taking part in campaigns that portrayed the uprising as a foreign conspiracy or a threat to the state. State cultural institutions—including theaters, concert halls, and festivals—helped sustain the official narrative by continuing to hold events in government-controlled areas, projecting an image of “normal” life and loyalty to the state. Artists’ positions were not uniform, however: some publicly criticized the authorities, left the country, or ended their professional careers, while others faced pressure, bans, and the risk of arrest.
How are the powers of the Damascus Opera House, the artists’ union, and Syria’s Ministry of Culture structured when public performances are approved or canceled? — Formally, the Damascus Opera House and other cultural institutions organize programs and coordinate performances with the Ministry of Culture; the artists’ union regulates professional status, membership, and performers’ eligibility to work. In practice, the final decision depends on state agencies and security structures: the ministry may approve or alter programs, while performances may be canceled because of an artist’s political position, security requirements, or other administrative directives. The union can restrict an artist’s participation through membership and professional procedures, but it is generally not an independent decision-making center separate from the state. The precise powers and approval procedures may vary depending on the specific event and the authorities’ current directives.
Full version: شادي جميل يعتذر للسوريين عن أغنية مدح فيها بشار الأسد